‘Millionaires tax’ passed. Mass. company leaders even now thrust again.

In pitching Healey on tax reform, Problem 1’s foes have not gotten the message

In November, voters selected a fairer tax method by passing Dilemma 1, the “millionaires tax” (“Business community has a massive ask of new governor: Deal with taxes,” Chesto Usually means Company, Jan. 19). Voters were being crystal clear that the greatest way to enhance Massachusetts’ financial state isn’t reducing taxes for the ultrarich fairly, it’s increasing them to commit in general public products that assist all citizens and businesses thrive, this sort of as well-funded faculties, improved streets and bridges, inexpensive general public colleges and universities, and dependable general public transportation.

Massachusetts faces serious problems that are threatening our financial competitiveness, from our substantial housing costs and crumbling infrastructure to the massive stress families deal with paying for youngster treatment and college.

But the small business lobbyists who led the dropping battle from Query 1 clearly haven’t gotten the message. They continue to shell out lip support to the have to have to solve those major challenges though focusing their serious strength on their newest exertion to cut taxes for the rich.

The passage of the Fair Share Modification showed that voters want to see our condition govt make big investments to tackle the difficulties we facial area as a Commonwealth. Significant, successful organizations and their rich traders will need to end placing up roadblocks to the alter voters demanded.

Jonathan Cohn

Coverage director

Progressive Massachusetts

Boston

We have to have a way to pay for investments that support all of us

Jon Chesto’s column “Business neighborhood has a huge talk to of new governor: Tackle taxes” speaks to enterprise leaders’ concentrate on lowering taxes. This, even while Chesto also notes that they want Governor Maura Healey to tackle the high price tag of accomplishing business enterprise by addressing problems this kind of as housing, road congestion, crumbling transit, and boy or girl treatment.

Current scientific studies demonstrate that the once-a-year expense for very affordable, significant-high quality early treatment and instruction is $5 billion even though growing housing vouchers to every person who requirements them could be $3.2 billion. That is not such as the costs of upgrading our transit and restoring our roads and bridges.

We need taxes, this sort of as people raised by the Good Share Amendment, to enable pay back for these points. That actually doesn’t seem to be far too considerably to question so that we can make investments that enable all of us, which includes our organization local community.

Mary Tittmann

Cambridge

Information Viber